Overview
The Exit phase answers the question: What happens after the strategy?
This phase compiles all five pillar outputs into actionable documentation that enables engineering teams to scope, build, and deploy without re-discovery. It's the bridge between consulting and implementation.
Why the Exit Phase Matters
The Problem We're Solving
After five pillars of strategic work, organizations have comprehensive insights about AI adoption. But without proper documentation handoff, critical knowledge gets lost in translation between consulting and engineering teams.
Common handoff failures:
- Engineering teams spend weeks re-discovering what the consulting team learned
- Strategic intent gets diluted through verbal handoffs
- Critical constraints and edge cases don't make it into specifications
- No clear success criteria for implementation
What Success Looks Like
By the end of the Exit phase, the client organization has:
- Executive Summary ready for board presentation and investment authorization
- Product Requirements Document that engineering can use to start architecture design immediately
- Implementation Roadmap with phased delivery milestones
- Complete Documentation Package indexing all pillar outputs
- Formal transition meeting between OAIO and implementation teams
Outputs and Handoffs
Exit Deliverables
| Deliverable | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Executive Summary | Board-ready investment authorization | View Example |
| Product Requirements Document (PRD) | Engineering specification for implementation | View Example |
| Implementation Roadmap | Phased delivery plan with dependencies | View Example |
| Documentation Package | Master index of all OAIO deliverables | View Example |
Deliverable Details
Executive Summary
- Strategic Context: Why AI adoption matters, shadow AI risks, five-pillar approach
- Agent Portfolio: Prioritized agents with ROI projections
- Governance Framework: Permission boundaries, human oversight, risk mitigation
- Financial Projections: 12-month cost forecast, expected returns, budget controls
- Approval Block: Signature lines for executive authorization
- Audience: C-suite, Board of Directors
Product Requirements Document (PRD)
- Functional Requirements: What the agent must do
- Data Sources: Required inputs with access specifications
- Integration Points: APIs, webhooks, system connections
- Success Criteria: Measurable performance thresholds
- Constraints: Governance boundaries from Pillar 3
- User Experience: Interaction patterns from Pillar 4
- Audience: Engineering leads, solution architects
Implementation Roadmap
- Foundation (2-4 weeks): Infrastructure, security baseline, CI/CD
- Agent MVPs (4-8 weeks each): Individual agent development and testing
- Integration (2-4 weeks): Cross-agent workflows, system connections
- Hardening (2-4 weeks): Scale testing, monitoring, FinOps dashboards
- Includes dependency mapping, resource requirements, risk markers, success gates
Documentation Package
- Pillar 1: Agent Portfolio, Executive Guardrails Brief, Propagation Plan
- Pillar 2: Agent Data Maps, Tagged Data Inventory, Data Owners Register, Access Models
- Pillar 3: Permission Specifications, Escalation Procedures, Governance Playbook
- Pillar 4: Interaction Specifications, Adoption Metrics Framework, Change Management Plan
- Pillar 5: Economic Thesis, Financial Controls, Cost Monitoring Dashboard Spec
- Exit: Executive Summary, PRD, Implementation Roadmap
Exit Phase Activities
Activity 1: Document Compilation (Days 1-3)
Gather all pillar outputs into a single organized package:
- Collect deliverables from each pillar workshop
- Verify completeness against deliverable checklist
- Resolve gaps - schedule follow-up sessions if documents are incomplete
- Standardize format - ensure consistent styling and terminology
- Cross-reference - link related documents across pillars
Activity 2: Executive Summary Drafting (Days 2-4)
Create the board-ready summary document:
- Synthesize strategic narrative from Pillar 1 outputs
- Compile agent portfolio with ROI projections from Pillar 5
- Summarize governance framework from Pillar 3
- Extract financial projections from Pillar 5
- Create approval block for executive signatures
Activity 3: PRD Development (Days 3-6)
Translate strategic intent into engineering specifications:
- Agent-by-agent requirements - functional specs from all pillars
- Data source specifications - from Pillar 2 data maps
- Integration requirements - from Pillar 4 interaction specs
- Constraint documentation - from Pillar 3 permission specs
- Success criteria - measurable thresholds for each agent
Activity 4: Roadmap Creation (Days 5-7)
Build the phased delivery plan:
- Phase sequencing - order agents by dependency and priority
- Duration estimation - based on complexity and team capacity
- Dependency mapping - identify blockers and prerequisites
- Resource planning - team composition per phase
- Risk identification - mark potential delays and mitigations
Activity 5: Transition Meeting (Days 7-10)
Formal handoff to implementation team:
- Document walkthrough - every deliverable reviewed
- Q&A session - clarify constraints and edge cases
- Risk transfer - documented risks and mitigation strategies
- Success alignment - agreement on implementation success criteria
- Escalation paths - who to contact for clarifications
Workshop Agenda: Exit Session
Exit Session Agenda (4 hours)
| Time | Activity | Participants |
|---|---|---|
| 0:00-0:30 | Executive Summary review | OAIO team, Executive Sponsor |
| 0:30-1:30 | PRD walkthrough (per agent) | OAIO team, Engineering Lead |
| 1:30-2:00 | Implementation Roadmap review | OAIO team, Project Manager |
| 2:00-2:15 | Break | All |
| 2:15-3:00 | Q&A and clarification | All stakeholders |
| 3:00-3:30 | Risk review and escalation paths | OAIO team, Implementation Lead |
| 3:30-4:00 | Formal handoff and signatures | All stakeholders |
Facilitation Tips
Effective Document Compilation
What works:
- Use standardized templates across all pillars
- Maintain a central document repository throughout engagement
- Version control all deliverables
- Include raw workshop outputs as appendices
What to avoid:
- Waiting until Exit to organize documents
- Relying on verbal handoffs for critical details
- Assuming implementation teams have context from pillar workshops
Successful Transition Meetings
What works:
- Include implementation team members in final pillar workshops
- Provide documentation package in advance of transition meeting
- Record the transition meeting for future reference
- Establish ongoing communication channel post-handoff
What to avoid:
- Rushing the transition meeting
- Excluding engineering voices from requirement review
- Assuming questions can be answered "later"
Success Metrics
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Document completeness | 100% | All pillar deliverables present |
| Executive sign-off | Yes | Signature on Executive Summary |
| Engineering readiness | Under 1 week | Time from handoff to architecture design start |
| Re-discovery time | Under 20% | Percentage of OAIO insights requiring re-validation |
| Implementation alignment | 90%+ | Engineering assessment of PRD clarity |
Common Challenges and Solutions
Challenge: Incomplete Pillar Deliverables
Solution: Build document review into each pillar close-out, not just Exit phase. Use a deliverable tracker throughout the engagement.
Challenge: Engineering Team Not Available
Solution: Schedule transition meeting early in the engagement. Include engineering observers in later pillar workshops.
Challenge: Executive Availability for Sign-off
Solution: Keep Executive Sponsor updated throughout engagement. Schedule Executive Summary review as a separate session before formal transition.
Challenge: Scope Creep in PRD
Solution: PRD should reflect only what was validated in the five pillars. New requirements identified during Exit become Phase 2 backlog items.
Static ContentServing from MDX file
Source: content/methodology/06-exit-handoff-guide.mdx